Reviewer Guidelines
The Role of Peer Reviewers / Peran Mitra Bestari
Peer reviewers play a crucial role in maintaining the quality and integrity of Ufuk Journal. Your expertise helps ensure that published work meets high scholarly standards and contributes meaningfully to Indonesia–Türkiye studies.
Mitra bestari memainkan peran krusial dalam menjaga kualitas dan integritas Jurnal Ufuk. Keahlian Anda membantu memastikan bahwa karya yang dipublikasikan memenuhi standar akademis tinggi dan berkontribusi secara bermakna pada studi Indonesia–Türkiye.
Review Process / Proses Review
- Invitation: You receive email invitation to review
Undangan: Anda menerima email undangan untuk mereview - Accept/Decline: Respond within 7 days
Terima/Tolak: Respons dalam 7 hari - Access Manuscript: Download and read the submission
Akses Naskah: Unduh dan baca submisi - Complete Review Form: Provide evaluation and comments
Lengkapi Formulir Review: Berikan evaluasi dan komentar - Submit Review: Within 28 days of acceptance
Kirim Review: Dalam 28 hari setelah menerima
Review Criteria / Kriteria Review
Please evaluate manuscripts based on:
Silakan evaluasi naskah berdasarkan:
| Criteria / Kriteria | Questions to Consider / Pertanyaan untuk Dipertimbangkan |
|---|---|
| Relevance Relevansi |
Does the manuscript address topics within Indonesia–Türkiye studies? Does it contribute to scholarly understanding? |
| Originality Orisinalitas |
Does it present new findings, perspectives, or approaches? Does it advance knowledge in the field? |
| Methodology Metodologi |
Is the research design appropriate? Are methods clearly described? Are limitations acknowledged? |
| Argumentation Argumentasi |
Is the main argument clear and well-developed? Is analysis logical and evidence-based? |
| Literature Literatur |
Does it engage adequately with relevant scholarship? Are sources appropriate? |
| Presentation Presentasi |
Is writing clear and well-organized? Are tables/figures appropriate? |
Confidentiality / Kerahasiaan
The peer review process is double-blind:
Proses peer review bersifat double-blind:
- Author identities are concealed from reviewers / Identitas penulis disembunyikan dari reviewer
- Reviewer identities are concealed from authors / Identitas reviewer disembunyikan dari penulis
- Please do not attempt to identify authors / Mohon tidak berusaha mengidentifikasi penulis
- Please do not share manuscripts with others / Mohon tidak membagikan naskah kepada orang lain
Timeline / Linimasa
| Respond to invitation / Respons undangan | 7 days / 7 hari |
| Complete review / Selesaikan review | 28 days / 28 hari |
| Reminder sent / Pengingat dikirim | 7 days before deadline / 7 hari sebelum tenggat |
Recommendation Options / Opsi Rekomendasi
✓ Accept: Publish as submitted (rare for first submission)
⟳ Minor Revisions: Small changes required; no re-review needed
⟳ Major Revisions: Substantial changes required; will be re-reviewed
↺ Reject and Resubmit: Fundamental issues, but topic appropriate
✗ Reject: Not suitable for this journal
Conflict of Interest / Konflik Kepentingan
Please decline to review if you:
Mohon tolak untuk mereview jika Anda:
- Have collaborated with the author(s) in the past 3 years / Pernah berkolaborasi dengan penulis dalam 3 tahun terakhir
- Are from the same institution as the author(s) / Berasal dari institusi yang sama dengan penulis
- Have personal or financial relationships that could bias your review / Memiliki hubungan personal atau finansial yang dapat membiaskan review Anda
Writing Constructive Reviews / Menulis Review yang Konstruktif
Tips for Effective Reviews / Tips untuk Review yang Efektif
- Be specific — cite page numbers and quotes / Spesifik — kutip nomor halaman dan teks
- Be constructive — suggest how to improve / Konstruktif — sarankan cara memperbaiki
- Be respectful — critique the work, not the author / Hormat — kritik karya, bukan penulisnya
- Be balanced — acknowledge strengths as well as weaknesses / Seimbang — akui kekuatan dan kelemahan
- Be timely — respect deadlines / Tepat waktu — hormati tenggat
Reviewer Recognition / Pengakuan Reviewer
We value our reviewers' contributions:
Kami menghargai kontribusi reviewer kami:
- Annual reviewer certificate / Sertifikat reviewer tahunan
- Recognition on journal website / Pengakuan di website jurnal
- Optional: Publons/Web of Science reviewer recognition / Opsional: Pengakuan reviewer Publons/Web of Science
